Curie Brief
Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.

Despite strong evidence for cardiovascular benefit, the vast majority of adults with type 2 diabetes and established heart disease aren't being prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists. A study of over 8,000 patients found only 22% received an SGLT2 and 25% a GLP-1 — raising concerns about prescribing gaps driven by cost, access, and physician bias around sex.
A large retrospective study published in the American Journal of Preventive Cardiology found that most adults with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are not receiving two drug classes with proven heart-protective benefits. Analyzing electronic medical records from over 8,000 patients at Houston Methodist, researchers found that only 22% were prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor and 25.3% a GLP-1 receptor agonist — despite both being guideline-recommended for this high-risk population.
The study also uncovered notable sex-based prescribing disparities. Women were significantly less likely to receive SGLT2 inhibitors for cardiovascular protection, while being more likely to receive GLP-1s — suggesting clinicians may be prescribing by patient phenotype (e.g., obesity vs. heart failure) rather than by overall cardiovascular risk. Experts warn this reflects a concerning pattern in clinical decision-making that needs to be addressed.
By the Numbers:
Why it matters: These medications can meaningfully reduce cardiovascular events and kidney disease progression, yet most eligible patients aren't getting them. Closing this prescribing gap — through better clinician awareness, reduced cost barriers, and greater pharmacist involvement — could prevent significant morbidity and mortality in a very high-risk population.