Curie Brief
Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.
News
A proposed CMS rule could ban third-party vendors from Medicare-reimbursed remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs starting January 2027 — just as states are pouring billions into rural remote care. Providers and tech groups warn the change could force many programs to shut down, cutting off over 1 million Medicare beneficiaries. Nearly 40,000 public comments have flooded in urging CMS to reconsider.
A proposed CMS rule buried in the 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule could fundamentally reshape how remote patient monitoring (RPM) works. Starting January 1, 2027, Medicare would only reimburse RPM and remote therapeutic monitoring (RTM) services performed by clinical staff directly employed by the billing practice — effectively banning the third-party vendors that most small, rural, and safety-net providers rely on to run these programs.
The timing couldn't be more awkward. States are simultaneously investing heavily in RPM through the $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program (RHTP), with 22 states committing ~$240 million in RPM-specific funding and 35 states directing $2.4 billion in broader tech investments toward remote care. Advocates warn that if the CMS rule is finalized, those state investments could become stranded — and CMS could even claw back RHTP funds from states that fail to meet program goals.
By the Numbers:
Why it matters: RPM has strong clinical evidence behind it — a 2025 meta-analysis of 40 randomized controlled trials found it reduces hospitalizations and shortens hospital stays. Eliminating vendor partnerships could push care back toward costly emergency departments and hospitals, ultimately raising Medicare costs rather than lowering them.
