Curie Brief
Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.

As automated insulin delivery (AID) systems multiply, clinicians can no longer assume all pump algorithms work the same way. Nurse practitioner Erin Henry breaks down the key differences — from total daily dose vs. adaptive basal algorithms to special considerations for type 1, type 2, and GLP-1 users. Understanding these nuances is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have come a long way, and with more options than ever, clinicians can no longer treat all pump algorithms as interchangeable. Nurse practitioner Erin Henry, presenting at the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists annual meeting, emphasized that understanding the specific algorithm powering a patient's pump is foundational to effective diabetes management — from adjusting carb-to-insulin ratios to troubleshooting site failures.
One of the most critical distinctions Henry highlights is between total daily dose (TDD) algorithms (like Omnipod 5, where the pump sets the basal rate and manual changes have no effect) and adaptive basal algorithms (like Tandem or twiist, where clinician-set basal rates actively influence outcomes). Choosing the wrong approach — or not knowing which type a patient uses — can mean interventions that do nothing at all.
Key Takeaways:
Why it matters: With AID systems becoming standard of care, clinicians who don't understand algorithm-specific behavior risk giving patients advice that's ineffective — or worse, harmful. Knowing the system means knowing how to truly help.