Curie Brief
Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.
Prediction markets are now letting people bet on drug trial outcomes — and experts are worried. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket generated $50 billion in trading in 2025, and are expanding into pharmaceutical clinical trials. Researchers warn this could distort trial participation, skew patient decisions, and compromise the scientific integrity that clinical research depends on.
Prediction markets — platforms where users buy and sell shares on future event outcomes — have officially entered the pharmaceutical space, and healthcare experts are sounding the alarm. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket now offer contracts on clinical trial endpoints, including whether specific drugs will meet their primary outcomes. Brown University health policy professor Matthew Vogel and colleagues flagged the trend in a New England Journal of Medicine perspective, calling it "unknown territory."
The core concern? Clinical trial integrity. Unlike betting on sports scores, wagering on drug trials creates financial incentives that could influence the behavior of both participants and researchers. High or low market odds could sway patients' decisions to enroll — or drop out — of trials, undermining the equipoise that valid research requires. Inaccurate market predictions could also mislead patients about their personal likelihood of benefiting from a treatment.
By the Numbers:
Why it matters: Vogel and colleagues are calling on the FDA and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission to establish transparent regulations — including pre-trade review of clinical trial contracts and restrictions on betting tied to easily manipulated metrics like adverse event reports. Without guardrails, the booming prediction market industry could quietly reshape how clinical trials are conducted and perceived.