Curie Brief
Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.
News
When primary care gets more thorough, hospitals see fewer planned admissions. A large UK study found that patients with multiple chronic conditions who received multimorbidity-specific primary care checks — like medication reviews and frailty assessments — were less likely to be admitted to hospital for elective care. Better care also meant more outpatient visits and emergency admissions, likely reflecting greater engagement with the healthcare system overall.
A large UK study is making the case that the type of primary care quality checks matters just as much as the quantity. Researchers analyzed data from over 468,000 adults in northwest London living with multimorbidity — defined as two or more long-term conditions — and found that more thorough, condition-specific primary care was linked to fewer elective hospital admissions.
The key distinction was between generic checks (like blood pressure monitoring and BMI measurements) and multimorbidity-specific checks (like medication reviews, care plan reviews, and frailty assessments). While both types were associated with more outpatient visits and emergency admissions — likely because better-monitored patients engage more with the system — only the multimorbidity-specific checks were tied to fewer planned hospital stays.
By the Numbers:
Why it matters: With multimorbidity on the rise globally, this study signals that investing in deeper, personalized primary care — not just routine checkboxes — could meaningfully reduce costly elective hospitalizations and better support patients managing complex, overlapping conditions.
