Curie Brief
Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.

You don't have to log every bite to see results. A new study of over 5,000 app users found that even tracking food just 2–3 days a week was linked to meaningful weight loss. The takeaway for clinicians and patients alike: consistency matters, but perfection isn't required.
Think you have to log every meal to make food tracking worth it? Think again. A new retrospective cohort study of 5,132 MyNetDiary app users found that higher food-tracking frequency was associated with greater weight loss over 6 months — but even infrequent trackers saw real results. Those who tracked 6–7 days a week lost over 11% of their body weight, while those logging just 2 days a week still shed more than 6%.
The study, led by MyNetDiary's co-founder and a registered dietitian, drew both praise and criticism from outside experts. Critics flagged the small final sample (less than 1% of the original cohort), likely selection bias, and the observational design — meaning causality can't be established. It's also unclear whether GLP-1 receptor agonist use contributed to some of the weight loss.
By the Numbers:
Why it matters: For clinicians counseling patients on weight management, this study offers a practical message: imperfect tracking still counts. Lowering the bar may improve patient adherence and long-term engagement with dietary self-monitoring tools.