Curie Brief
Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.

A new meta-analysis offers some reassurance for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) on IL-17 inhibitors. Across 24 studies, new-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was rare in clinical trials, with no statistically significant difference between treated patients and those on placebo. However, real-world studies showed higher event rates, signaling a need for better standardized IBD reporting in future research.
A new meta-analysis published in JAMA Dermatology offers some reassurance for clinicians treating hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) with IL-17 inhibitors. Across 24 studies — including 10 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) — new-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was rare, and no statistically significant difference in IBD risk was found between patients receiving IL-17 inhibitors (bimekizumab, secukinumab, sonelokimab, izokibep) and those on placebo.
That said, the picture isn't entirely clear. Nonrandomized, real-world studies showed notably higher IBD event rates compared to RCTs, and the authors caution that small event numbers and inconsistent baseline IBD reporting limit firm conclusions.
For dermatologists and gastroenterologists co-managing HS patients, this data provides cautious reassurance — but also a call to action. Standardized IBD outcome reporting in future trials is essential to better quantify risk and guide safer prescribing decisions.