Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.
The North American Spine Society (NASS) has released a patient safety position statement calling for formal surgical training requirements for spine interventions. As spinal technologies advance faster than training standards, NASS warns that some newer procedures may not meet the rigor of traditional care. The statement has already sparked dialogue among more than 15 surgical and nonsurgical societies.
The North American Spine Society (NASS) has issued a new patient safety position statement outlining the education, training, and competency standards required to perform spine interventions. The move comes amid rapid technological advances in spinal care that have outpaced existing training frameworks, leaving gaps in standardized procedural minimums outside of formal surgical spine training.
The statement specifically recommends that surgical interventions involving structural anatomy, biomechanical alteration, or spinal cord/nerve decompression be performed only by clinicians with formal surgical spine training. It also advocates for prospective registries in nonstructural interventions to balance innovation with patient safety.
Key Takeaways:
Why it matters: Without clear competency benchmarks, patients may unknowingly receive complex spine procedures from clinicians without adequate training — potentially before complications even surface. This position statement aims to establish a baseline before harm occurs, not after.
