Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.

A sweeping review of 121 systematic analyses covering ~9 million young people finds digital media use is consistently linked to adverse mental, behavioral, physical, and cognitive outcomes in children and adolescents. Experts say the fix isn't just telling kids to put down their phones — it requires redesigning digital platforms themselves. Pediatricians are calling for safety-by-design, age-appropriate controls, and independent research to protect the next generation.
A landmark review published in The Lancet, analyzing 121 systematic reviews and 52 meta-analyses covering roughly 9 million individuals aged 0–24, confirms that digital media use is consistently associated with worse mental, behavioral, physical, cognitive, and social health outcomes in children and adolescents. While some benefits were noted, the scale and consistency of the harms are difficult to overlook.
The findings draw a key developmental distinction: for children under 10, total screen time is the primary concern, while for adolescents aged 10–24, problematic social media use takes center stage. Experts warn that for children under 6, screen time may crowd out critical experiences needed for language development, emotional self-regulation, and attention — and may also contribute to myopia and sedentary behavior.
By the Numbers:
Why it matters: Individual behavior change campaigns aren't enough. Pediatricians and researchers are pushing for structural platform reforms — including privacy-by-default, anti-harassment tools, and reduced compulsive design features — alongside digital literacy education in schools. With AI now entering children's lives, the stakes are only getting higher.