Curie Brief
Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has launched a sweeping initiative to track and study vaccine injuries — including a new NIH clinic and physician reimbursements for VAERS reporting. But experts warn the effort undermines existing, robust safety systems and could further erode vaccine confidence during the worst measles outbreak in 35 years.
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has unveiled a broad vaccine injury initiative, including a new NIH research clinic in Bethesda, a proposed CMS reimbursement for physicians who report suspected adverse events to VAERS, and a mandate for electronic health records to capture vaccine-related injuries. The stated goal is to better identify, document, and respond to health problems following vaccination.
Experts, however, are pushing back. Vaccine specialists like Dr. Paul Offit of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia argue that robust safety monitoring systems — including VAERS, V-safe, the Vaccine Safety Datalink, and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Project — already exist and function well. The American Medical Association echoed concerns, warning that continued erosion of confidence in established vaccination practices will lower immunization rates and fuel the return of preventable diseases.
The backdrop makes the timing especially notable: the U.S. is in the midst of its worst measles outbreak in 35 years, with over 4,000 cases nationally and nearly 1,100 cases and five deaths in Pennsylvania alone.
By the Numbers:
Why it matters: At a time when vaccine-preventable diseases are resurging, a federal initiative that raises questions about vaccine safety — without clear scientific grounding — risks further eroding public trust and immunization rates, with potentially serious public health consequences.