Curie Brief
Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.

From "don't eat after 6 PM" to "honey is healthier than sugar," nutrition myths are everywhere — and patients bring them to your office. A new evidence-based review tackles 10 of the most persistent dietary claims, separating fact from fiction. Spoiler: the amount of sugar matters more than the type, and most lactose-intolerant patients don't need to ditch dairy entirely.
Nutrition myths travel fast — through generations, social media, and straight into the exam room. A new evidence-based review takes on 10 of the most widely circulated dietary claims, giving clinicians clear, science-backed answers to share with patients.
Some findings confirm popular wisdom (margarine does have a better fatty acid profile than butter; red and processed meats do raise cardiovascular and colorectal cancer risk), while others push back hard. Honey, agave syrup, and whole-cane sugar offer no meaningful health advantage over regular table sugar — what matters is total sugar intake, not the source. And that post-dinner shot of liquor? It actually delays gastric emptying rather than aiding digestion.
Key Takeaways:
Why it matters: Patients routinely make dietary decisions based on misinformation. Equipping clinicians with concise, evidence-based rebuttals helps counter harmful myths and supports better nutritional counseling in everyday practice.