Loading Curie Briefs...
Getting the latest healthcare news for you
Getting the latest healthcare news for you
Long-term patient-doctor relationships cut hospital costs by up to 39%, a new Dutch study finds. Yet in the US, insurance churn, primary care underfunding, and high-volume scheduling make continuity the exception, not the rule. Experts say the fix is possible — it just requires health systems to actually measure and prioritize it.
A new Dutch study of more than 100,000 patients puts hard numbers on something many clinicians have long suspected: the longer a patient stays with the same general practice, the better — and cheaper — their care gets. Patients with 5+ years at the same practice saw urgent hospital admission costs drop by up to 21% and overall hospital costs fall by up to 39%. The mechanism is intuitive — a clinician who knows your baseline catches problems earlier, orders fewer redundant tests, and keeps manageable issues out of the ER.
The US, however, is structurally working against this. Less than 5% of US healthcare spending goes to primary care (roughly one-third of what peer nations spend), nearly one in three adults lacks a regular primary care source, and insurance churn constantly breaks up established relationships. Primary care physicians also earn 90% less than surgical specialists — a gap that fuels shortages and makes continuity harder to sustain.
Key Takeaways:
Why it matters: Continuity of care isn't just a feel-good concept — it's a measurable driver of lower costs and better outcomes. For health system leaders and primary care clinicians, the evidence is clear: investing in long-term patient relationships pays dividends that far outweigh the upfront effort.
