Curie Brief
Turn on cookies to sign in
Signing in saves your progress to your Curie account. We can only do that with cookies on — turn them on to continue.
News
The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine has filed a federal lawsuit demanding the withdrawal of the 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, alleging that a secretive, industry-influenced process violated federal administrative law. The suit claims HHS bypassed a 20-expert scientific committee and handed guideline-writing to insiders tied to the meat, dairy, and supplement industries. A March 2026 poll found half of US adults don't trust the guidelines' scientific basis.
The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine has filed a lawsuit in US District Court in Washington, DC, demanding the withdrawal of the 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The complaint alleges that HHS bypassed a 20-expert independent scientific committee — which spent nearly two years reviewing evidence — and instead convened a secretive, handpicked panel with ties to the beef, dairy, and supplement industries, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Legal experts say the case has a real shot. Georgetown Law professor Lawrence Gostin noted that the government "overturned decisions by a scientific committee without providing any good reasons," a potential APA violation. The lawsuit mirrors ongoing litigation challenging the CDC's vaccine advisory panel, where a federal judge already temporarily halted recommendations over unlawful appointments.
By the Numbers:
Why it matters: The Dietary Guidelines shape federal nutrition programs — from school lunches to SNAP — affecting millions of Americans. If the court sides with the plaintiffs, it could force a full rewrite of the guidelines and set a precedent for transparency and conflict-of-interest standards in federal nutrition policy.
