Doctors see the value in wearable device data, but a new AMA survey reveals that structural barriers are keeping it out of clinical practice. While 86% of U.S. physicians review wearable data at least sometimes, only 6% have it integrated into their workflows. Reimbursement gaps, lack of clinical validation, and EHR incompatibility are the main culprits.
Nearly half of Americans own a smartwatch or health-tracking ring, and their doctors are paying attention — but not in any systematic way. A new survey from the American Medical Association of 2,222 physicians across six countries found that while the vast majority of doctors see clinical value in wearable data, the healthcare system hasn't caught up with the technology.
The core problem: wearable data can't easily get into electronic health records, leaving physicians to manually sift through patients' phones during already-short appointments. Add in murky liability frameworks, a lack of clinical validation for many device features, and almost no reimbursement pathway for reviewing consumer wearable data, and it's a recipe for a missed opportunity. AMA CEO Dr. John Whyte put it plainly: "If physicians don't believe in the data, and physicians don't have a way to integrate it into workflow, it doesn't matter what you pay."
By the Numbers:
Why it matters: With AI expanding the ability to mine continuous health data, wearables could become a powerful clinical tool — but only if reimbursement structures, regulatory frameworks, and EHR systems evolve to support them.
